# B6 — Initial visual + interaction scan (public pages)

Captured: 2026-07-30T12:18:58+00:00 `[T]`  
Method: public-page browser navigation, DOM/landmark inspection through browser console, and visual inspection in a Chromium browser. No accounts, forms, or search submissions were used. This is a partial B6 pass: browser-runtime screenshots were inspected but are not represented here as downloadable image files; the factual visual record below is the durable evidence.

## 1) Niania.pl — Poland / childcare
- URL: https://niania.pl/  
- Accessed: 2026-07-30  
- Page title: `Niania, Opiekunka do dziecka dla Ciebie | Niania.pl`

### Visible composition and primary interaction
- A wide photo hero of an adult and infant carries the message “Znajdź troskliwą nianię w okolicy” and “Dodaj darmowe ogłoszenie.”
- The first decision is a two-option role selector: `Szukam niani` or `Jestem nianią`; the DOM exposes this as two `serviceType` radio inputs. The resulting public form contains city/district, engagement-type and name fields.
- Top navigation is extremely sparse: logo/Poland-leading claim, `Zaloguj`, `Zarejestruj`.

### Visible proof, category and density signals
- Mid-page signals include a testimonial carousel, a “Pomocni.pl” group badge, and a business/agencies callout.
- Below the conversion area are long three-column city and job-city link lists—strongly visible local-search/SEO architecture.
- The footer visibly links the sibling services `Pomoc domowa`, `Opieka seniora`, and `Opieka zwierząt`. This establishes that this incumbent already operates a sibling-site family rather than one blended multi-care user experience.
- Visual language: subdued coral/pink action elements, dark slate text, lots of white space; the page becomes text/link dense beneath the hero.

### Source/inspection pointers
- Public DOM text and controls, browser capture 2026-07-30.
- The footer statement says the site is part of Pomocni.pl and contains links to the three sibling category sites. Treat any claim about operational sharing as UNVERIFIED until B1/B2 source collection validates it.

## 2) Babysits Poland — childcare marketplace
- URL: https://www.babysits.pl/  
- Accessed: 2026-07-30  
- Page title: `Opiekunki i praca dla opiekunek do dzieci | Babysits`

### Visible composition and primary interaction
- The top page presents a search-first hero: `Szybko znajdź opiekunkę`, a city/postcode field, category tabs (child caregivers / nannies / jobs), a `Rozpocznij za darmo` CTA, plus a visible `4,7 / 5` link.
- A visible carousel gives individual caregiver photographs, first name, city, rating icons and review counts before the user reaches the safety section.
- A separate three-step explanatory section visibly narrates search → contact → book/payment/receipt.

### Visible proof and safety signals
- The page visibly claims “Zaufało nam ponad 8 milionów niań.” This is a platform claim, not independently verified.
- A large dedicated safety block visibly lists mandatory identity verification, monitoring of messages/profiles/support, user reviews/references, post-booking ratings, and a criminal-record certificate. B3 must validate the mechanics and eligibility rather than treat the landing-page copy as proof.
- Visual language: pale blue/pink organic shapes, family photography and illustrated safety mascot; considerably more product-flow-forward than Niania.pl.

### Source/inspection pointers
- Public DOM text and controls, browser capture 2026-07-30.
- The city search input and safety list are visible on the public landing page.

## 3) Care.com — multi-category comparator
- URL: https://www.care.com/  
- Accessed: 2026-07-30  
- Page title: `Care.com: Find Child Care, Babysitters, Senior Care, Pet Care and Housekeeping`

### Visible composition and primary interaction
- A large family-photo hero leads with `Connecting families with quality, local caregivers`, a ZIP field, and `Search` CTA; it also has a `Join now` action in the header.
- Immediately below the hero is “One membership for every season of life,” represented as six equal category cards: Child care, Senior care, Adult care, Housekeeping, Pet care and Tutoring.
- A later visible carousel renders caregiver cards from more than one care category: person photo, name, role/experience copy and star rating overlay.

### Visible proof, category and commercial signals
- The public page visibly states “Plans start at $12.99/mo”; the exact current commercial terms need B2 verification.
- A later visible product panel frames “Search safer,” “Quality care,” “Unlimited connections” and “Exclusive discounts,” next to a phone-style search-list mockup. This is a marketing representation, not proof that every feature is available in every location/category.
- A large claim states “Over 45 million families and caregivers have turned to Care.com”; mark as platform claimed until B2 independently corroborates it.
- Visual language: editorial large type, strong photography, lime/pink/teal accents, and a dense but well-separated marketing narrative.

### Source/inspection pointers
- Public DOM text and controls, browser capture 2026-07-30.
- Public category links resolve to child, senior, adult, housekeeping, pet and tutoring paths.

## Access constraints / non-results
| Platform | URL | Result | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover | https://www.rover.com/ | Cloudflare verification page | No visual/product claims collected. B2 may use accessible public documentation; B6 needs an authorised/accessible capture later. |
| Papa | https://www.papa.com/ | Browser navigation timed out | No visual/product claims collected. Retry only in a later bounded capture pass. |

## Provisional design questions for P4 (not conclusions)
1. Is a unified multi-care landing page sufficiently coherent for first-time Poland users, or should a child-care-specific entry point lead to sibling categories only after the trust decision?
2. Which concrete trust markers should appear before, during, and after search—not simply as a generic safety content block?
3. Can local liquidity be honestly shown without copying national-scale “millions” claims or exposing thin supply?
